At Lehman, How a Real-Estate Star's Reversal of Fortune Contributed to Collapse
Wall Street Journal, Alex Frangos, October 1, 2008
O'Shaughnessy says warned on Bear leverage
Reuters, Joseph A. Giannone, December 9, 2008
Behind AIG's Fall, Risk Models Failed to Pass Real-World Test
Wall Street Journal, Carrick Mollenkamp, Serena Ng, Liam Pleven and Randall Smith, October 31, 2008
The Reckoning: Citigroup Saw No Red Flags Even as it Made Boulder Bets
New York Times, Eric Dash and Julie Creswell, November 23, 2008
email this page to a friend
print this pageThe ERM evaluation process is an attempt to augment and improve the existing management review process. S&P see this as a way to improve their comments on management quality.
Summary notes from Standard and Poor conference call re: ERM for General Corporates, May 9, 2008
S&P commented that you cannot have active Stakeholder Management if your policies, procedures and measurements have not been communicated to key stakeholders. S&P wants to know if the Board of Directors is engaged in the ERM process.
Summary notes from Standard and Poor conference call re: ERM for General Corporates, May 9, 2008
At Lehman, How a Real-Estate Star's Reversal of Fortune Contributed to Collapse
Wall Street Journal, Alex Frangos, October 1, 2008
O'Shaughnessy says warned on Bear leverage
Reuters, Joseph A. Giannone, December 9, 2008
Behind AIG's Fall, Risk Models Failed to Pass Real-World Test
Wall Street Journal, Carrick Mollenkamp, Serena Ng, Liam Pleven and Randall Smith, October 31, 2008
The Reckoning: Citigroup Saw No Red Flags Even as it Made Boulder Bets
New York Times, Eric Dash and Julie Creswell, November 23, 2008
The ERM evaluation process is an attempt to augment and improve the existing management review process. S&P see this as a way to improve their comments on management quality.
Summary notes from Standard and Poor conference call re: ERM for General Corporates, May 9, 2008
S&P commented that you cannot have active Stakeholder Management if your policies, procedures and measurements have not been communicated to key stakeholders. S&P wants to know if the Board of Directors is engaged in the ERM process.
Summary notes from Standard and Poor conference call re: ERM for General Corporates, May 9, 2008
At Lehman, How a Real-Estate Star's Reversal of Fortune Contributed to Collapse
Wall Street Journal, Alex Frangos, October 1, 2008
O'Shaughnessy says warned on Bear leverage
Reuters, Joseph A. Giannone, December 9, 2008
Behind AIG's Fall, Risk Models Failed to Pass Real-World Test
Wall Street Journal, Carrick Mollenkamp, Serena Ng, Liam Pleven and Randall Smith, October 31, 2008
The Reckoning: Citigroup Saw No Red Flags Even as it Made Boulder Bets
New York Times, Eric Dash and Julie Creswell, November 23, 2008
The ERM evaluation process is an attempt to augment and improve the existing management review process. S&P see this as a way to improve their comments on management quality.
Summary notes from Standard and Poor conference call re: ERM for General Corporates, May 9, 2008
S&P commented that you cannot have active Stakeholder Management if your policies, procedures and measurements have not been communicated to key stakeholders. S&P wants to know if the Board of Directors is engaged in the ERM process.
Summary notes from Standard and Poor conference call re: ERM for General Corporates, May 9, 2008